Sacrifice, Accolades and Selfishness
Posted: Monday, October 12, 2009
By Dianne Lehmann
hi dianne,this was an excellent article, nostalgia and truth!you are a versatile writer-you write about all kinds of things, and that's really good.i can tell you this, i understand every word you said, i've been guilty of it myself for years, until i learned in the the 12 step program, when i got my first year coin: To thine own self be true.i didn't understand it at first, coming from the same place you were talking about-woudn't that make me selfish?but, i was taught that if you don't take care of yourself, nobody will, and you need to focus on your needs, whether it's an afternoon nap, or a glass of wine-sike, i miss a glass of wine, but it doesn't miss me.a walk in the woods, a ride on a bike, drawing on canvas-whatever makes your juices flow, you are responsible to do. for yourself, and for others. taking care of yourself is the best thing you can do for anybody, and allows you to help others when they are in need.my best to you,sueHi Sue."taking care of yourself is the best thing you can do for anybody, ... "When I first came to that realization, I thought it was so selfish. But then I realized the truth of it. Doesn't mean I've always done a good job of taking care of myself. But as I've gotten older, I've learned just how really important it is and am doing a much better job.Not only do you have to take care of yourself, you are the one who ultimately knows how to do it best. Although, if you've read Camille Strate's latest article, it's clear that not everyone knows what they really need and try to get others to take care of them instead.Thank you, Sue, for your thoughts and for taking the time to share them with me.Be well, be happy and let the light shine from within,Dianne
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I agree with you totally.Linda DHi Linda.I have a feeling that many women will agree. Thank you for reading my article and taking the time to let me know that you did.Dianne
I think as women and mothers, the needs of our family and friends are always at the top of our priority list. It's our nature. But you're right when you say we have to take care of ourselves in order to take care of others. I also agree that if you choose to make sacrafices, you do so because you want to, and not for the praise it brings you. There's nothing worse than having someone do something for you only to have them remind you over and over about it. I think your mother had good intentions, but was overwhelmed and probably had some self-esteem issues as you suggest. This was very well written Dianne. I appreciate what it took for you to share something so personal with us.Hi Brianna.Obviously, there are articles that are easy to write and submit. This was easy to write (seemed to write itself), but not so easy to submit ... you are correct ... it is very personal.Thank you for your thoughts and thanks for reading.Dianne
We have something in common in this, a mother with a martyr complex. On the converse, while my own mother has a need to be recognized, even to the exclusion of other people, I can't remember her ever recognizing my own accomplishments. She will still talk about an event or thing from the past that I did or possessed, and attribute it to one of my brothers, leaving me entirely out of the picture. I am persona non grata, and so I've had to move on with my own life without her. I've grown up believing that to rely on our parents for social reinforcers is a vain exercise, so I look instead to my peers where such reinforcement is abundant.
On the other hand, I've always been fascinated by people who grew up where moral and emotional support was as natural as a walk in the park, and focused a good deal on that aspect in my interviews with young artists and performers, to find out if their success was a product of their parents' support. Usually, the answer was yes, but not always.I learned about a syndrome that may or may not apply, called narcissistic personality disorder, where the individual has a need for exclusive attention, and doesn't acknowledge when other egos are involved. This might seem contradictory if the person is seen as self-sacrificing. But, just as you said, if the intent of the sacrifice isn't to give, but instead to receive attention, especially pity, then it's not authentic benevolence at play, but something more pathological.-GHi Gregory.Very well put. But I don't honestly think that my mom had NPD. She gave credit where credit was due, she just needed a lot of praise to feel good.It's a sad thing to read that you had so little recognition from your mother. But it sounds like you have developed your own resourcefulness. So maybe in a way, she did give you something of value.There were many things my parents taught to me; not the least important of which was how not to live my life. I'm grateful for all of it.Thank you, Gregory, for reading my article and adding your thoughts to it.Dianne
OUTSTANDING piece, Dianne. Agreed...on all counts. Especially "selfish is not a dirty word". I've found that 'sacrifice' is anything but when we do things for others because we WANT to, as opposed to keeping score and waiting for our 'just reward'. Why bother?Good to see you got it without having to live it.Brava!Camille.That whole keeping score thing makes me hot under the collar. When I do something for someone, it is because I want to, not because I expect anything in return. Aargh! But that doesn't mean that I didn't live it a bit at one time. We live and learn.Thanks for reading and all that.Hugs,Dianne
Good stuff here, Dianne.One should do the right thing because it is the right thing to do. When you "sacrifice" expecting something in return, even if it's just an "attaboy," then it is a transaction and not a sacrifice.Again, GREAT stuff here!Hi Ken.I hadn't thought about it in quite that way. I think you are right to call it a "transaction." Interesting thought.Thanks for stopping by,Dianne
Hi Dianne, good points. I think it all comes down to motive behind why we do what we do for others. If if comes from the need for acceptance and to make ourselves feel good, then we will be left disappointed. Sacrifice is just that, by its own definition it should require nothing in return, it is an offering for the sake of another motivated by love. I think you are right about your mom - a good woman for sure, but her insecurities got the best of her. I think this is the root of all do for others for the sake of being praised. Great write with much heart. Thanks! TeresaHi Teresa.I'd have to agree that it's all in the motive. And as for personal insecurities ... I don't even want to go there. I think they're the bane of us all ... as you wrote.Thanks for reading this and commenting. I hope that everything is well with you and your family!Hugs,Dianne
Hi Dianne,
This is great and I agree with you wholeheartedly. Hanging on a wall in front of me is an affirmation that reads: "I put my attention on the quality of my personal health. I build upon my greatest wealth by doing so."
I am not at it 100 per cent but so much better than I used to be. This article will help me even more. Thank you for it!
Hugs,
AvisHi Avis.I'm always most happy when something I've written is helpful. And that is a wonderful affirmation. Thanks for sharing it.Big hugs back at you,DianneUnfortunately, the term sacrifice "to make holy" is a transactional process. It's what it means in religious, culturaly, social and political jargon for at least 4000 years. What you are talking about is "victimizing" and that's not sacrifice, though it's very frequently one of the steps involved in sacrifice. A sacrifice is an understood contract between party A (who will offer something) to party B (who will accept the sacrifice or break the contract and walk away: as is shown when God wouldn't accept Cain's sacrifice in Genesis). A gives soemthing they value to B SO THAT they will receive something they value more in return. For ancient pagans, it was done so the gods wouldn't kill them, today, we sacrifice an out in baseball to advanc ea runner, we might sacrifice candy for lent if we're Catholic...it's always a transaction, and there is always something expected in return...but NEVER in victimization: that's when party A offers party C in sacrifice to party B: party C has been victimized (generally unwillingly, too)Hi Rox Runner.Thanks for the Biblical clarification. But, in my opinion, religious sorts (of which my mom was one) and baseball teams do not have a lock on sacrifice. Mom valued the praise very highly. That was the problem.I do thank you for reading and for taking the time to add your comment. And I do understand your point about victimization. People are perfectly capable of making victims of themselves (no third party involvement required) and do so quite frequently. Behavioral psychology talks about this aberration in depth.Again thanks,Dianne
Dianne Lehmann is a jewelry designer who has been in business since January of 2000. Her interest in designing and manufacturing jewelry goes back beyond that to 1994. It took her many years of trying various creative outlets to finally figure out that making jewelry is what she really enjoys. She has also discovered that she loves to write for Wryte Stuff. If you like, you may view her jewelry creations at http://www.syzygyjewelry.com
Leave a Public Comment or Question:
Disclaimer: All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.
